Not scored yet · Public scoring is not active
Listed label values only. Missing values stay Not available rather than inferred.
Protein, fat, fiber, moisture, and calorie values stay exactly as listed on the source label.
| Metric | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26 | % min |
| Fat | 16 | % min |
| Fiber | 3 | % max |
| Moisture | 12 | % max |
| Calories | 3859 | kcal/kg |
| Calories per cup | 382 | kcal/cup |
The ingredient list stays as a source fact. Mapping appears only when source-backed data is available.
Ingredient list from label
Beef, rice, whole grain wheat, poultry by-product meal, whole grain corn, soybean meal, beef fat preserved with mixed-tocopherols, corn protein meal, fish meal, natural flavor, fish oil, dried egg product, probiotics, vitamins, and minerals.
Ingredient facts
Mapped notes
Protein sources
Beef, poultry by-product meal, soybean meal, beef fat preserved with mixed-tocopherols, corn protein meal, fish meal, fish oil
Carbohydrate sources
rice
Fat sources
beef fat preserved with mixed-tocopherols, fish oil
Positive ingredient signals: Marine omega support, Named animal protein, Named probiotic strain.
The label is anchored by these protein contributors: Beef, poultry by-product meal, soybean meal, beef fat preserved with mixed-tocopherols, corn protein meal, fish meal, fish oil.
Linked ingredient pages are not mapped yet.
Use Compare when this product is one of two or more realistic options.
These sections stay collapsed until a user wants more label context.
Calories per cup
382
Protein per 1000 kcal
67.4
Fat per 1000 kcal
41.5
Estimated glycemic load
N/A
Not listed on the official source.
This is a moderate-density formula for its format.
The official data currently marks probiotic support as not present.
Generic animal terms weaken transparency because the source material is less clear.
Partially supported because transparency-focused guidance supports caution around vague sourcing, while the severity of the penalty remains internal methodology.
Matched ingredients: poultry by-product meal, fish oil
Legume-heavy formulas deserve closer interpretation when they materially shape the ingredient deck.
Internal methodology only because this layer uses legume presence as a prompt for closer context review, not as proof of harm or poor formulation.
Matched ingredients: soybean meal
Legumes are materially present in the ingredient deck and should be interpreted in context.
Internal methodology only because this layer uses legume presence as a prompt for closer context review, not as proof of harm or poor formulation.
Matched ingredients: soybean meal
Named marine oils are a useful positive signal for skin, coat, and inflammatory support.
Partially supported because broad literature context exists, but product-level effect and dosing relevance are not mapped here.
Matched ingredients: fish oil
The ingredient deck clearly includes named animal protein rather than relying on vague animal terms.
Partially supported because transparency-focused guidance and professional review norms support the direction of this interpretation, but the exact signal effect is internal.
Matched ingredients: Beef
A named probiotic strain is more interpretable than a vague digestive-support claim.
Partially supported because named strains improve interpretability, but this layer does not verify viability, dose, or clinical relevance.
Matched ingredients: probiotics
Plant protein concentrates can inflate crude protein impressions without matching animal-protein quality.
Partially supported because label-interpretation concerns are literature-informed, but the importance assigned to this signal is still internal methodology.
Matched ingredients: corn protein meal
This label includes a plant protein concentrate that may inflate the apparent protein story.
Internal methodology only at this stage because the interpretation is used as a conservative review flag, not as a source-backed outcome claim.
Matched ingredients: corn protein meal
The ingredient panel includes vague generic animal terminology that weakens transparency.
Partially supported because vague ingredient naming can reasonably weaken transparency confidence, while the downstream impact remains internal.
Matched ingredients: poultry by-product meal, fish oil
Formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Dog Food Nutrient Profiles for maintenance of adult dogs.
Useful benchmark brand with transparent product segmentation.
Source & data record
Label-data checklist
Reflects source, label, nutrition, and optional nutrient data completeness only. It is not a product quality score.
Public scoring is not active. Data confidence reflects source completeness, not a nutrition rating, and missing fields stay Not available rather than inferred.
IAMS
Merrick
Blue Buffalo
This page shows source-backed label facts. It does not rank product quality.