Use this page when you are deciding whether this dog food deserves a closer look, a side-by-side comparison, or a deeper ingredient check. It is meant to move you from product curiosity into a clearer decision.
Decision snapshot
Built for adult maintenance
A quick read on whether this formula deserves a closer look.
Quick verdict
Best for
Not ideal for
Key highlights
Best next actions from this product page
This page is strongest when you are deciding whether this formula deserves a place in a shortlist, a direct comparison against another option, or a deeper ingredient review. It is not just a static reference page.
Use the score breakdown, ingredient panels, related needs, and linked ingredients together. The goal is to make the product easier to judge, not to imply clinical certainty from a single page.
Use Compare when you want tradeoffs, Analyzer when the label needs inspection, need pages when the decision depends on a specific feeding goal, and Finder when this page sends you back into shortlist building.
Decision path
Product pages work best when they feed directly into comparison, label inspection, need context, and methodology review.
Decision tool
Move into side-by-side review when you want to weigh this formula against another realistic option.
Label tool
Use Analyzer when ingredient order, additives, or label signals deserve closer inspection than a summary can give.
Need context
Use need pages when you want practical context before deciding whether this product belongs in the shortlist.
Trust
See how product scoring, ingredient interpretation, and support-aware explanation stay visible and conservative.
Page tour
This page is dense on purpose. Follow this order if you want the shortest path from first impression to a defensible conclusion.
Read the top summary first so you know whether this formula is promising before you get lost in the numbers.
02Use the nutrition block to inspect protein, fat, fiber, moisture, estimated carbs, and calorie density together.
03Move into the ingredient interpretation panels to see whether the formula story matches the nutrient story.
04Use the methodology and linked ingredients to understand where the numbers come from and what to verify next.
Ingredient quality scores 41, nutrition balance scores 0, and safety scores 52. The formula is best interpreted as
Ingredient quality
41
Nutrition balance
0
Digestibility
70
Safety
52
Overall
48
| Metric | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Protein min | 29 | % |
| Fat min | 17 | % |
| Fiber max | 6 | % |
| Moisture max | 12 | % |
| Ash | 0 | % |
| Estimated carbs (as fed) | 0 | % |
| Estimated carbs (dry matter) | 0 | % |
| Protein dry matter | 29 | % |
| Fat dry matter | 17 | % |
| Calories | 3405 | kcal/kg |
| Calories per cup | 388 | kcal/cup |
| kcal per 100g | 0 | kcal |
Calories per cup
388
Protein per 1000 kcal
85.2
Fat per 1000 kcal
49.9
Estimated glycemic load
Not estimated
This is a moderate-density formula for its format. Its macro energy profile is best judged alongside fit scores rather than calories alone.
Protein sources
Beef, beef meal, pork meal, beef fat, lamb, fish oil, beef tripe, beef liver, beef kidney, zinc proteinate, freeze-dried beef, freeze-dried lamb
Carbohydrate sources
pea starch
Fat sources
beef fat, fish oil
Fiber sources
whole pumpkin, dried chicory root
Functional additives
pork, whole red lentils, whole pinto beans, whole green peas, whole green lentils, whole chickpeas, whole yellow peas, fish oil, lentil fiber, natural pork flavor, pork liver, pork kidney, salt, vitamin E supplement, dried kelp, whole pumpkin, collard greens, whole apples, whole pears, mixed tocopherols (preservative), taurine, calcium pantothenate, freeze-dried pork, riboflavin, folic acid, vitamin A acetate, vitamin D3 supplement, dried chicory root, turmeric, sarsaparilla root, althea root, rose hips, juniper berries, citric acid (preservative), rosemary extract, dried Lactobacillus acidophilus fermentation product, dried Bifidobacterium animalis fermentation product, dried Lactobacillus casei fermentation product
Ingredient interpretation
Positive ingredient signals: Marine omega support, Named animal protein, Targeted fiber support.
The label is anchored by these protein contributors: Beef, beef meal, pork meal, beef fat, lamb, fish oil, beef tripe, beef liver, beef kidney, zinc proteinate, freeze-dried beef, freeze-dried lamb.
Digestive-support ingredients are present through whole pumpkin, dried chicory root.
Watch-outs on this label: Generic animal ingredient, Legume presence, Legume presence signal, Transparency warning signal.
Support boundary
Ingredient signals now carry conservative claim mapping so analyzer, product, and need surfaces can distinguish source-backed interpretation from internal scoring policy.
Signal presence and score effects are separate. Support mapping describes interpretation framing, not the validity of the score impact.
Partially supported: 5. Internal methodology: 1. Unresolved: 0.
Ingredient quality
41
Digestibility
70
Safety
52
Ingredient deck
Beef, pork, beef meal, whole red lentils, whole pinto beans, whole green peas, pork meal, beef fat, whole green lentils, whole chickpeas, whole yellow peas, lamb, fish oil, lentil fiber, natural pork flavor, pea starch, beef tripe, beef liver, beef kidney, pork liver, pork kidney, salt, vitamin E supplement, dried kelp, whole pumpkin, zinc proteinate, collard greens, whole apples, whole pears, mixed tocopherols (preservative), taurine, calcium pantothenate, freeze-dried beef, freeze-dried pork, freeze-dried lamb, riboflavin, folic acid, vitamin A acetate, vitamin D3 supplement, dried chicory root, turmeric, sarsaparilla root, althea root, rose hips, juniper berries, citric acid (preservative), rosemary extract, dried Lactobacillus acidophilus fermentation product, dried Bifidobacterium animalis fermentation product, dried Lactobacillus casei fermentation product.
Generic animal terms weaken transparency because the source material is less clear.
Partially supported because transparency-focused guidance supports caution around vague sourcing, while the severity of the penalty remains internal methodology.
Matched ingredients: fish oil
Legume-heavy formulas deserve closer interpretation when they materially shape the ingredient deck.
Internal methodology only because this layer uses legume presence as a prompt for closer context review, not as proof of harm or poor formulation.
Matched ingredients: whole red lentils, whole pinto beans, whole green peas, whole green lentils, whole chickpeas, whole yellow peas, lentil fiber, pea starch, whole pears
Legumes are materially present in the ingredient deck and should be interpreted in context.
Internal methodology only because this layer uses legume presence as a prompt for closer context review, not as proof of harm or poor formulation.
Matched ingredients: whole red lentils, whole pinto beans, whole green peas, whole green lentils, whole chickpeas, whole yellow peas, lentil fiber, pea starch, whole pears
Named marine oils are a useful positive signal for skin, coat, and inflammatory support.
Partially supported because broad literature context exists, but product-level effect and dosing relevance are not mapped here.
Matched ingredients: fish oil
The ingredient deck clearly includes named animal protein rather than relying on vague animal terms.
Partially supported because transparency-focused guidance and professional review norms support the direction of this interpretation, but the exact signal effect is internal.
Matched ingredients: Beef
Targeted fibers such as pumpkin or chicory can support stool quality and digestive tolerance.
Partially supported because digestive-support framing is literature-informed, but real-world tolerance remains context-dependent.
Matched ingredients: whole pumpkin, dried chicory root
The ingredient panel includes vague generic animal terminology that weakens transparency.
Partially supported because vague ingredient naming can reasonably weaken transparency confidence, while the downstream impact remains internal.
Matched ingredients: fish oil
Omega-3
0%
Omega-6
0%
Taurine
0%
Calcium
0%
Phosphorus
0%
Magnesium
0%
Probiotic support is present via Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium animalis, Lactobacillus casei.
Sensitive stomach
0
Weight management
0
Puppy fit
0
Senior fit
0
Allergy support
0
ACANA Red Meat Recipe Dog Food is formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Dog Food Nutrient Profiles for All Life Stages, including growth of large size dogs (70 lb or more as an adult).
The page combines raw guaranteed-analysis style values with derived estimates such as dry matter protein, carbohydrate estimate, ingredient transparency, glycemic load, digestibility interpretation, and need-fit scoring.
Appeals to shoppers looking for premium dry formulas with strong ingredient-forward marketing.
Farmina
Hill's Science Diet
Purina Pro Plan