Not scored yet · Public scoring is not active
Listed label values only. Missing values stay Not available rather than inferred.
Protein, fat, fiber, moisture, and calorie values stay exactly as listed on the source label.
| Metric | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 33 | % min |
| Fat | 17 | % min |
| Fiber | 4 | % max |
| Moisture | 8.5 | % max |
| Calories | 3910 | kcal/kg |
| Calories per cup | N/ANot listed on the official source. | kcal/cup |
The ingredient list stays as a source fact. Mapping appears only when source-backed data is available.
Ingredient list from label
Freshly prepared deboned duck 16%, duck meal 16%, sweet potato, peas, potatoes, freshly prepared deboned venison 7.5%, freshly prepared deboned rabbit 4%, egg 3.1%, herring 3.1%, salmon oil 2.5%, vitamins and minerals, alfalfa, vegetable gravy, duck fat 1.2%, pea protein, glucosamine, MSM, chondroitin, apple, carrot, spinach, psyllium, seaweed, fructooligosaccharides, mannanoligosaccharides, camomile, peppermint, marigold, cranberry, aniseed, fenugreek.
Ingredient facts
Mapped notes
Protein sources
Freshly prepared deboned duck 16%, duck meal 16%, salmon oil 2.5%, duck fat 1.2%, pea protein
Carbohydrate sources
sweet potato, potatoes
Fat sources
salmon oil 2.5%, duck fat 1.2%
Positive ingredient signals: Marine omega support, Named animal protein, Targeted fiber support.
The label is anchored by these protein contributors: Freshly prepared deboned duck 16%, duck meal 16%, salmon oil 2.5%, duck fat 1.2%, pea protein.
Linked ingredient pages are not mapped yet.
Use Compare when this product is one of two or more realistic options.
These sections stay collapsed until a user wants more label context.
Calories per cup
N/A
Not listed on the official source.
Protein per 1000 kcal
84.4
Fat per 1000 kcal
43.5
Estimated glycemic load
N/A
Not listed on the official source.
Not listed on the official source, so calorie density stays N/A rather than inferred.
Omega-3
0.9%
Omega-6
2.4%
Calcium
1.86%
Phosphorus
1.42%
The official data currently marks probiotic support as not present.
Legume-heavy formulas deserve closer interpretation when they materially shape the ingredient deck.
Internal methodology only because this layer uses legume presence as a prompt for closer context review, not as proof of harm or poor formulation.
Matched ingredients: peas, pea protein
Legumes are materially present in the ingredient deck and should be interpreted in context.
Internal methodology only because this layer uses legume presence as a prompt for closer context review, not as proof of harm or poor formulation.
Matched ingredients: peas, pea protein
Named marine oils are a useful positive signal for skin, coat, and inflammatory support.
Partially supported because broad literature context exists, but product-level effect and dosing relevance are not mapped here.
Matched ingredients: salmon oil 2.5%
The ingredient deck clearly includes named animal protein rather than relying on vague animal terms.
Partially supported because transparency-focused guidance and professional review norms support the direction of this interpretation, but the exact signal effect is internal.
Matched ingredients: Freshly prepared deboned duck 16%
Plant protein concentrates can inflate crude protein impressions without matching animal-protein quality.
Partially supported because label-interpretation concerns are literature-informed, but the importance assigned to this signal is still internal methodology.
Matched ingredients: pea protein
This label includes a plant protein concentrate that may inflate the apparent protein story.
Internal methodology only at this stage because the interpretation is used as a conservative review flag, not as a source-backed outcome claim.
Matched ingredients: pea protein
Targeted fibers such as pumpkin or chicory can support stool quality and digestive tolerance.
Partially supported because digestive-support framing is literature-informed, but real-world tolerance remains context-dependent.
Matched ingredients: psyllium
A complete dry food for puppies and adults.
Appeals to shoppers prioritizing grain-free and fish-forward formulas.
Source & data record
Label-data checklist
Reflects source, label, nutrition, and optional nutrient data completeness only. It is not a product quality score.
Public scoring is not active. Data confidence reflects source completeness, not a nutrition rating, and missing fields stay Not available rather than inferred.
IAMS
Merrick
Blue Buffalo
This page shows source-backed label facts. It does not rank product quality.