iP

iPickPet

Decision-first pet nutrition

Instinct Paté Real Rabbit Entrée Wet Cat Food
Instinct

Paté Real Rabbit Entrée Wet Cat Food

CatWetAdult

Source detail

Partial

Data available: 6/6

Nutrition profile

Protein10% minFat3% minFiber1.5% maxCarbsNot listedCalories1,018 kcal/kgIngredientqualityNot listed

Compare with similar

See how this formula stacks up on protein, fat, fiber, and listed ingredients.

Compare now

Nutrition at a glance

Protein
10 % min
Fat
3 % min
Fiber
1.5 % max
Moisture
78 % max
Calories
1018 kcal/kg

Ingredient highlights

Rabbit
Pork
Pork Broth
Pork Liver

You might also compare

See all
Details

Guaranteed analysis

Protein, fat, fiber, moisture, and calorie values stay exactly as listed on the source label.

MetricValueBasis
Protein10% min
Fat3% min
Fiber1.5% max
Moisture78% max
Calories1018kcal/kg
Calories per cupN/ANot listed on the official source.kcal/cup

Ingredient list

The ingredient list stays as a source fact. Mapping appears only when source-backed data is available.

Ingredient list from label

Rabbit, Pork, Pork Broth, Pork Liver, Ground Flaxseeds, Natural Flavor, Peas, Menhaden Fish Oil (Preserved With Mixed Tocopherols), Carrots, Potassium Chloride, Salt, Sunflower Oil, Calcium Carbonate, Minerals (Iron Proteinate, Zinc Proteinate, Copper Proteinate, Manganese Proteinate, Sodium Selenite, Potassium Iodide), Choline Chloride, Vitamins (Vitamin E Supplement, Niacin Supplement, Thiamine Mononitrate, Vitamin A Supplement, d-Calcium Pantothenate, Vitamin B12 Supplement, Riboflavin Supplement, Pyridoxine Hydrochloride, Biotin, Folic Acid, Vitamin D3 Supplement), Taurine, Magnesium Sulfate, Cranberries, Blueberries, Pumpkin, Tomato, Broccoli, Kale, Parsley.

Ingredient facts

Primary protein
N/A
Primary carb
N/A
Processing
extruded kibble
Main ingredient
N/A

Mapped notes

Protein sources

Menhaden Fish Oil (Preserved With Mixed Tocopherols), Zinc Proteinate, Copper Proteinate, Manganese Proteinate

Fat sources

Menhaden Fish Oil (Preserved With Mixed Tocopherols), Sunflower Oil, Magnesium Sulfate

Fiber sources

Pumpkin

Positive ingredient signals: Marine omega support, Targeted fiber support.

The label is anchored by these protein contributors: Menhaden Fish Oil (Preserved With Mixed Tocopherols), Zinc Proteinate, Copper Proteinate, Manganese Proteinate.

Functional nutrients

The official data currently marks probiotic support as not present.

Ingredient signals visualization

Generic animal ingredient

caution

Generic animal terms weaken transparency because the source material is less clear.

Partially supportedRefs 3
moderate

Partially supported because transparency-focused guidance supports caution around vague sourcing, while the severity of the penalty remains internal methodology.

Matched ingredients: Menhaden Fish Oil (Preserved With Mixed Tocopherols)

IQ -6Digestibility -1Safety -5

Legume presence

caution

Legume-heavy formulas deserve closer interpretation when they materially shape the ingredient deck.

Internal methodologyRefs 1
low

Internal methodology only because this layer uses legume presence as a prompt for closer context review, not as proof of harm or poor formulation.

Ingredient rules
Presence alone should not be overstated.

Matched ingredients: Peas

IQ -4Digestibility -3Safety -1

Legume presence signal

caution

Legumes are materially present in the ingredient deck and should be interpreted in context.

Internal methodologyRefs 1
low

Internal methodology only because this layer uses legume presence as a prompt for closer context review, not as proof of harm or poor formulation.

Ingredient rules
Presence alone should not be overstated.

Matched ingredients: Peas

IQ -4Digestibility -2

Marine omega support

positive

Named marine oils are a useful positive signal for skin, coat, and inflammatory support.

Partially supportedRefs 2
low

Partially supported because broad literature context exists, but product-level effect and dosing relevance are not mapped here.

Omega-3 review [ext]Ingredient rules
Presence alone is not proof of efficacy, adequacy, or bioavailable dosing.

Matched ingredients: Menhaden Fish Oil (Preserved With Mixed Tocopherols)

IQ +3Digestibility +1Safety +1

Targeted fiber support

positive

Targeted fibers such as pumpkin or chicory can support stool quality and digestive tolerance.

Partially supportedRefs 2
low

Partially supported because digestive-support framing is literature-informed, but real-world tolerance remains context-dependent.

Gut diet review [ext]Ingredient rules

Matched ingredients: Pumpkin

IQ +2Digestibility +5Safety +1

Transparency warning signal

caution

The ingredient panel includes vague generic animal terminology that weakens transparency.

Partially supportedRefs 3
moderate

Partially supported because vague ingredient naming can reasonably weaken transparency confidence, while the downstream impact remains internal.

Matched ingredients: Menhaden Fish Oil (Preserved With Mixed Tocopherols)

IQ -6Safety -4

Adequacy and brand notes

Instinct Paté Real Rabbit Entrée Recipe is formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Cat Food Nutrient Profiles for all life stages.

Context for comparing raw-coated kibble and wet recipes on label facts.

Methodology v1.2

iPickPet Score, context fit, and data confidence

Methodology v1.2

iPickPet Score

82/100

High data confidence

A higher iPickPet Score means stronger recorded label quality, transparency, and formulation signals. It is not a health or safety claim.

Why this score

  • Named protein source recorded: Rabbit.
  • Ingredient list is recorded with 40 listed ingredients.
  • Guaranteed analysis includes protein, fat, fiber, and moisture.

Match Score

Strong context match

Match for Cat / Adult / Wet

100/100

A 100/100 Match Score means the recorded label facts fully matched this stated context. It does not mean the product is universally better.

Data Confidence

High data confidence

100/100

Higher Data Confidence means more of the expected source-backed fields are present. It does not say the product is better than another one.

Why it matches

  • Species aligns with this context.
  • Life stage aligns with this context.
  • Food type aligns with this context.

Good fit for

  • Cat
  • Adult
  • Wet

Possible tradeoffs

  • Generic animal ingredients are flagged on the label.
  • No additional positive formulation signals were recorded.

Data gaps

  • No major data gaps were recorded for the active scoring fields.

Label transparency notes

  • iPickPet Score 82/100 reflects label quality, transparency, and formulation signals.
  • 100/100 Data Confidence reflects source completeness, not product quality.
  • Match Score measures fit to the stated context only.
  • Missing values stay visible instead of inferred.
  • Methodology v1.2 keeps iPickPet Score, Match Score, and Data Confidence separate.

Compared with similar products

Use Compare to apply the same context across multiple products while keeping the products in the order you selected.

Open Compare

Based on source-backed label facts. iPickPet Score reflects label quality, transparency, and formulation signals. Match Score is context-specific. Data Confidence reflects source completeness. See Methodology v1.2.

Methodology & sources

Source & data record

Where this page's facts come from

Medium data confidence
Source status
Source-backed
Verified date
2026-07-07
Nutrition basis
Not available
Public score record
iPickPet Score 82/100

Label-data checklist

  • Guaranteed analysisAvailable
  • Ingredient listAvailable
  • Adequacy / life-stage statementAvailable
  • Life-stage contextAvailable

Reflects source, label, nutrition, and optional nutrient data completeness only. It is not a product quality score.

iPickPet Score 82/100Strong context matchHigh data confidence

Public scoring uses Methodology v1.2 from source-backed label facts. iPickPet Score describes label quality, transparency, and formulation signals. Match Score describes fit to the stated context. Data Confidence describes source completeness. Missing fields stay Not available rather than inferred.

Review methodology